首页> 外文OA文献 >A survey of Australian chiropractors’ attitudes and beliefs about evidence-based practice and their use of research literature and clinical practice guidelines
【2h】

A survey of Australian chiropractors’ attitudes and beliefs about evidence-based practice and their use of research literature and clinical practice guidelines

机译:澳大利亚脊医对循证实践及其对研究文献和临床实践指南的使用的态度和信念的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background\ud\udResearch into chiropractors’ use of evidence in clinical practice appears limited to a single small qualitative study. The paucity of research in this area suggests that it is timely to undertake a more extensive study to build a more detailed understanding of the factors that influence chiropractors’ adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) principles. This study aimed to identify Australian chiropractors’ attitudes and beliefs towards EBP in clinical practice, and also examine their use of research literature and clinical practice guidelines.\ud\udMethods\ud\udWe used an online questionnaire about attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards the use of EBP in clinical practice that had been developed to survey physiotherapists and modified it to ensure that it was relevant to chiropractic practice. We endeavoured to survey all registered Australian chiropractors (n = 4378) via email invitation distributed by Australian chiropractic professional organisations and the Chiropractic Board of Australia. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine univariate associations between responses to items measuring attitudes and beliefs with items measuring: age; years since registration; attention to literature; and use of clinical practice guidelines.\ud\udResults\ud\udQuestionnaires were returned by 584 respondents (response rate approximately 13%). The respondents’ perceptions of EBP were generally positive: most agreed that the application of EBP is necessary (77.9%), literature and research findings are useful (80.2%), EBP helps them make decisions about patient care (66.5%), and expressed an interest in learning or improving EBP skills (74.9%). Almost half of the respondents (45.1%) read between two to five articles a month. Close to half of the respondents (44.7%) used literature in the process of clinical decision making two to five times each month. About half of the respondents (52.4%) agreed that they used clinical practice guidelines, and around half (54.4%) agreed that they were able to incorporate patient preferences with clinical practice guidelines. The most common factor associated with increased research uptake was the perception that EBP helps make decisions about patient care.\ud\udConclusions\ud\udMost Australian chiropractors hold positive attitudes towards EBP, thought EBP was useful, and were interested in improving EBP skills. However, despite the favourable inclination towards EBP, many Australian chiropractors did not use clinical practice guidelines. Our findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the low response rate.
机译:背景\ ud \ ud对脊医在临床实践中使用证据的研究似乎仅限于一项小型定性研究。缺乏该领域的研究表明,现在应该进行更广泛的研究,以更详细地了解影响脊医采用循证实践(EBP)原则的因素。这项研究旨在确定澳大利亚脊医在临床实践中对EBP的态度和信念,并检查他们对研究文献和临床实践指南的使用。\ ud \ udMethods \ ud \ ud我们使用了在线问卷,了解对脊椎治疗的态度,信念和行为。 EBP在临床实践中的使用,该EBP已开发用于调查物理治疗师并对其进行了修改,以确保它与脊椎治疗实践相关。我们努力通过澳大利亚脊骨治疗专业组织和澳大利亚脊骨治疗委员会发出的电子邮件邀请调查所有注册的澳大利亚脊骨治疗师(n = 4378)。进行逻辑回归分析以检验对测量态度和信念的反应与测量以下因素之间的单变量关联:自注册之日起;对文学的关注; \ ud \ udResults \ ud \ ud调查问卷由584名受访者返回(答复率约为13%)。受访者对EBP的看法总体上是积极的:大多数人认为应用EBP是必要的(77.9%),文献和研究结果是有用的(80.2%),EBP帮助他们做出有关患者护理的决定(66.5%),并表示对学习或提高EBP技能的兴趣(74.9%)。几乎一半的受访者(45.1%)每月阅读2至5篇文章。接近一半的受访者(44.7%)每月在临床决策过程中使用文献2至5次。大约一半的受访者(52.4%)同意他们使用临床实践指南,大约一半(54.4%)同意他们能够将患者的偏好与临床实践指南相结合。与研究吸收增加相关的最常见因素是人们认为EBP有助于做出有关患者护理的决定。然而,尽管倾向于EBP,但许多澳大利亚脊医并未使用临床实践指南。由于回应率低,应谨慎解释我们的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号